Report

Couple-Focused Services in Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinics: Identifying the Need, 2009
Mia R. Zolna
,
Jennifer J. Frost
 and
Laura D. Lindberg

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Key Points

  • Three complementary surveys were conducted in 2009 to assess interest in and provision of couple-focused family planning services in Title X clinics. Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of adult female clients of Title X–funded clinics; a sample of their male partners; and clinic administrators.
  • Nearly two-thirds of the women receiving family planning services from Title X–funded clinics reported interest in attending couple-focused counseling or classes with their partner.
  • Women were most interested in “planning when to have a baby,” but clinics were more apt to cover “choosing and using birth control” and “talking with a partner about birth control.”
  • Among women in relationships, nine in 10 said their partner knew about their clinic visit; seven in 10 said their partner would accompany them if asked and another quarter said their partner would do so “if he had time.”
  • Two-thirds of women in relationships said they would like their partner to see a clinician at their clinic by himself. About half said they would like their partner to come to the clinic to talk to their clinician with them, but only one in four reported that their current partner had ever done so.
  • Clinic staff underestimated women’s interest in couple-focused services: Fewer than 50% of clinic administrators thought that women were interested in partner or couples’ services; however, 65% of all women reported interest in these services.
  • Although two-thirds of clinics offered couple-focused counseling, fewer than 40% actively recruited partners and only about one in 10 offered couple-focused classes or workshops.
  • Financial limits were the greatest barrier for clinics wanting to start or expand couple-focused services; eight in 10 clinic administrators reported that funding was inadequate, and half reported a shortage of staff trained to provide such services.
  • Given financial constraints, family planning providers seeking to expand couple-focused care may want to consider allowing and encouraging more partners to attend contraceptive counseling sessions, or ensuring that partners in the waiting room receive educational materials; both are strategies that could be incorporated without significant new resources.

1. Finer LB and Henshaw SK, Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006, 38(2):90–96. 2. Frost JJ, Darroch JE and Remez L, Improving contraceptive use in the United States, In Brief, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2008, No. 1. 3. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, One in Three: the Case for Wanted and Welcomed Pregnancy, Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, 2007. 4. Brown SS and Eisenberg L, The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995. 5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy People 2020 Topics & Objectives, Dec. 2, 2010, , accessed Mar. 7, 2011. 6. Frost JJ, Trends in U.S. women’s use of sexual and reproductive health care services, 1995–2002, American Journal of Public Health, 2008, 98(10):1814–1817. 7. Frost JJ, Henshaw SK and Sonfield A, Contraceptive Needs and Services: National and State Data, 2008 Update, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2010. 8. Sonenstein FL, Punja S and Scarcella C, Future Directions for Family Planning Research: a Framework for Title X Family Planning Service Delivery Improvement Research, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 2004. 9. Becker S and Robinson JC, Reproductive health care: services oriented to couples, International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1998, 61(3):275–281. 10. Hart J, Ross E, and Silva S, A Collaborative Evaluation of Strategies to Encourage Couples-focused Health Service Delivery in a Sample of Title X–supported Family Planning Clinics, Washington, DC: Health Systems Research, 2006. 11. Sonenstein, FL ed., Young Men’s Sexual and Reproductive Health: Toward a National Strategy, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 2000. 12. Brindis CD et al., Let’s hear it for the guys: California’s Male Involvement Program, International Journal of Men’s Health, 2005, 4(1):29–53. 13. Raine T et al., The other half of the equation: serving young men in a young women’s reproductive health clinic, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2003, 35(5):208–214. 14. Kalmuss D and Austrian K, Real men do...real men don’t: young Latino and African American men’s discourses regarding sexual health care utilization, American Journal of Men’s Health, 2010, 4(3):218–230. 15. Kost K et al., Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, Contraception, 2008, 77(1):10–21. 16. Lindberg LD and Singh S, Sexual behavior of single adult American women, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):27–33. 17. Blanc AK, The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: an examination of the evidence, Studies in Family Planning, 2001, 32(3):189–213. 18. Grady WR, Klepinger DH and Nelson-Wally A, Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women, Family Planning Perspectives, 1999, 31(4):168–175. 19. Oakley D and Bogue EL, Quality of condom use as reported by female clients of a family planning clinic, American Journal of Public Health, 1995, 85(11):1526– 1530. 20. Cox S, Posner SF and Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Who’s responsible? Correlates of partner involvement in contraceptive decision making, Women’s Health Issues, 2010, 20(4):254–259. 21. Harvey SM et al., Relationship power, sexual decision making and condom use among women at risk for HIV/ STDS, Women & Health, 2002, 36(4):69–84. 22. Kraft JM et al., Pregnancy motivations and contraceptive use: hers, his, or theirs?, Women’s Health Issues, 2010, 20(4):234–241. 23. Grady WR et al., Men’s perceptions of their roles and responsibilities regarding sex, contraception and childrearing, Family Planning Perspectives, 1996, 28(5):221–226. Guttmacher Institute 21 24. Frost JJ and Darroch JE, Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(2):94–104. 25. Forste R and Morgan J, How relationships of U.S. men affect contraceptive use and efforts to prevent sexually transmitted diseases, Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 30(2):56–62. 26. Santelli JS et al., Combined use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among inner-city Baltimore women, Family Planning Perspectives, 1995, 27(2):74–78. 27. Kerns J et al., Partner influence on early discontinuation of the pill in a predominantly Hispanic population, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2003, 35(6):256–260. 28. Severy LJ and Silver SE, Two reasonable people: joint decision making in contraceptive choice and use, Advances in population : psychosocial persepctives, 1993, 1:207–227. 29. Grady WR et al., The role of relationship power in couple decisions about contraception in the United States, Journal of Biosocial Science, 2010, 42(3):307–323. 30. Fowler CI et al., Family Planning Annual Report: 2008 National Summary, Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International, 2009. 31. Mosher WD and Jones J, Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008, National Center for Health Statistics, 2010. 32. Miller E et al., Intimate partner violence and health care-seeking patterns among female users of urban adolescent clinics, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2010, 14(6):910–917. 33. Miller E et al., Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy, Contraception, 2010, 81(4):316–322. 34. Moore AM, Frohwirth LF and Miller E, Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States, Social Science & Medicine, 2010, 70(11):1737–1744. 35. Colarossi L, Breitbart V and Betancourt G, Barriers to screening for intimate partner violence: a mixed-methods study of providers in family planning clinics, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2010, 42(4):236–243. 36. Stata Corp., Stata Statistical Software: Release 11.1. College Station, TX: Stata Corp LP, 2009. 37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Preconception care questions and answers, Jan. 2, 2011, , accessed Jan. 10, 2011. 38. Frost JJ, Lindberg L and Finer LB, Young adults’ knowledge, norms and attitudes: key factors associated with risk for unplanned pregnancy, submitted for publication, 2011.

Download Report

Topic

United States

Geography