The Community Abortion Morbidity Study was an exploratory qualitative study examining community perceptions of abortion morbidity experience among residents of Kampala and Mbarara districts in 2003. The data came from eight focus group discussions with women aged 18–60, 82 in-depth interviews with women aged 18–60 and men aged 20–50, and 33 indepth interviews with health care providers (HCPs). This report presents evidence on reasons for the occurrence of unwanted pregnancy, abortion practice, health problems women experience as a result of stopping a pregnancy, actions women take to obtain treatment, the barriers they face in obtaining treatment, and the social and economic consequences of abortion.
Abortion Morbidity in Uganda: Evidence from Two Communities
Author(s)
Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?
1. Singh S et al., The incidence of induced abortion in Uganda,
International Family Planning Perspectives, 2005, 31(4):183–
191.
2. Mirembe F and Okong P, Risk Factors Associated with
Maternal Mortality in Three Kampala Hospitals, Kampala,
Uganda: Makerere University, 1995.
3. Kinoti S et al., Monograph on Complications of Unsafe
Abortion in Africa, Arusha, Tanzania: Reproductive Health
Research Programme, Commonwealth Regional Health
Community Secretariat for East, Central and Southern Africa,
1995, Table 9, p. 65.
4. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and ORC Macro,
Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2000–2001, Entebbe,
Uganda: UBOS; and Calverton, MD, USA: ORC Macro, 2001;
and Abou Zhar C and Wardlaw T, Maternal Mortality in 2000:
Estimates Developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA, Geneva:
World Health Organization (WHO), 2003.
5. Singh S et al., 2005, op.cit. (see reference 1).
6. World Bank, World Development Report 2007: Development
and the Next Generation, The World Bank: Washington, DC,
2006.
7. Uganda Ministry of Health, Statistical Abstract (2002), 2003,
<http://www.health.go.ug/docs/abstract2001.pdf>, accessed
Dec. 13, 2006.
8. WHO, Taking Stock: Health Worker Shortages and the
Response to AIDS, Geneva: WHO, 2006.
9. Ibid.
10. UBOS and ORC Macro, 2001, op. cit. (see reference 4).
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. Kinoti S et al., 1995, op. cit. (see reference 3); Mirembe F, A
situation analysis of induced abortions in Uganda, African
Journal of Fertility, Sexuality and Reproductive Health, 1996,
1(1): 79–80; Kasolo J, Abortion in Uganda, Initiatives in
Reproductive Heath Policy, 2000, 3(2):9–10; Sedgh G, Bankole
A, Oye-Adeniran B, Adewole IF, Singh S, Hussain R, Unwanted
pregnancy and associated factors among Nigerian women,
International Family Planning Perspectives, 2006, 32(4): 175-
184; Oniang’o R, Unwanted adolescent pregnancy: who chooses
abortion and why, in Rogo K, ed., Unsafe Abortion in Kenya:
Findings from Eight Studies, Nairobi, Kenya: Population
Council, 1996.
14. Mirembe F, 1996, op. cit. (see reference 13).
15. Kinoti S et al., 1995, op. cit. (see reference 3).
16. Sedgh G et al., 2006, op. cit. (see reference 13).
17. Nyanzi S, Nyanzi B and Bessie K, Contemporary myths,
sexuality misconceptions, information sources, and risk perceptions
of Bodabodamen in Southwest Uganda, Sex Roles,
2005, 52(1–2):111–119.
18. Prada E et al., Abortion and postabortion care in Uganda: a
report from health care professionals and health facilities,
Occasional Report, New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute,
No. 17, 2005.
19. Ibid.
20. Bazira ER, Induced abortion at Mulago Hospital, Kampala,
1983–1987: A case for contraception and abortion laws’reform,
Tropical Medicine, 1992, 11(1):13–16; and Mirembe F, 1996,
op. cit. (see reference 13).
21. Kinoti S et al., 1995, op. cit. (see reference 3).
22. Prada E et al., 2005, op. cit. (see reference 18).
23. Ibid.
24. Thaddeus S and Maine D, Too far to walk: maternal mortality
in context, Social Science and Medicine, 1994, 38(8):
1091–1110.
25. Kyomuhendo GB, Low use of rural maternity services in
Uganda: impact of women’s status, traditional beliefs and limited
resources, Reproductive Health Matters, 2003, 11(21):16– 26.
26. Weeks A et al., Personal accounts of ‘near-miss’ maternal
mortalities in Kampala, Uganda, BJOG, 112(9):1302–1307.
27. Ibid.; Kyomuhendo GB, 2003, op. cit. (see reference 24);
Fetters T, Akiode A and Oji E, How Far Is Too Far? Searching
for Postabortion Care in Kano State Hospitals, Nigeria, Chapel
Hill, NC, USA: Ipas, 2004.
28. Prada E et al., 2005, op. cit. (see reference 18); Singh S et al.,
2005, op. cit. (see reference 1); and Moore AM et al., How HIV
status impacts child-bearing decisions: results from a qualitative
study in Kampala, Uganda, paper presented at the annual meeting
of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA,
USA, March 30-April 1, 2006.
29. Kyomuhendo GB, 2003, op. cit. (see reference 25); and
Nyanzi S, Nyanzi B and Bessie K, ‘Abortion? That’s for
women!’ narratives and experiences of commercial motorbike
riders in South-Western Uganda, African Journal of
Reproductive Health, 2005, 9(1):142–161.
30. Skuster P, Advocacy in whispers: the impact of the USAID
Global Gag Rule upon free speech and free association in the
context of abortion law reform in three East African countries,
Michigan Journal of Gender and Law, 2004, 11:97–127.
31. Ibid.
32. Blanc A et al., Negotiating Reproductive Outcomes in
Uganda, Calverton, Maryland: Macro International; Kampala,
Uganda: Institutes of Statistics and Applied Economics, 1996;
and UBOS and ORC Macro, 2001, op. cit. (see reference 4).
33. UK Department for International Development (DFID),
Girls’education: Towards a better future for all, London: DFID,
2005; and Leach F et al., An Investigative Study of the Abuse of
Girls in African Schools, London: DFID, 2003.
34. Neema S, Musisi N and Kibombo R, Adolescent sexual and
reproductive health in Uganda: a synthesis of research evidence,
Occasional Report, New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute,
2004, No. 14.
35. Neema S, Kibombo R and Moore AM, Qualitative evidence
of adolescents’sexual and reproductive health experiences in selected
districts of Uganda, New York: Guttmacher Institute,
forthcoming.
36. Schuler SR, Choque ME and Rance S, Misinformation, mistrust,
and mistreatment: family planning among Bolivian market
women, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(4): 211–221.
37. Prada et al., 2004, op. cit. (see reference 18).
38. Kyomuhendo GB, 2003, op. cit. (see reference 25).
39. Brookman-Amissah E and Moyo JB, Abortion law reform
in Sub-Saharan Africa: no turning back, Reproductive Health
Matters, 2004, 12 (24 suppl.):227–234.
40. Singh S et al., 2005, op.cit. (see reference 1).
41. Neema S et al., Adolescent sexual and reproductive health
in Uganda: results from the 2004 Uganda National Survey of
Adolescents, Occasional Report, New York: Guttmacher
Institute, 2006, No. 25.
42. Ibid.; and Neema S et al., 2004, op. cit. (see reference 34).
43. Neema S et al., 2004, op. cit. (see reference 34).
44. Population and Development Strategies Sub-Programme
under Fifth Country Programme 2001-2005, UNFPA/GoU.
45. Prada E et al., 2005, op. cit. (see reference 18).
46. Neema S et al., op. cit. (see reference 34).
47. Ibid.
48. Thanks to Grace Bantebya Kyomuhendo for this insight.
49. African Union, Protocol to the African Charter on Human
and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, 2003,
<http://www.achpr.org/english/_info/women_en.html>, accessed
Jan. 26, 2006.
50. Letter from the Archbishop Bakyenga P, Catholic Bishops’
Conference, Mbarara, Uganda, Jan. 19, 2006.
51. Skuster P, 2004, op. cit. (see reference 30).
52. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights,
Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination
of Discrimination Against Women: Uganda, May 31,
1995,<http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/
29bdab56ab159783c12563e200462379?Opendocument>,
accessed Jan. 26, 2006.
53. Singh S et al., 2005, op. cit. (see reference 1).