Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
March 2021

Florida’s Proposed 20-Week Abortion Ban Would Force Pregnant People to Travel More Than 30 Times as Far for Care

Authors

Elizabeth Nash, Guttmacher Institute Jonathan Bearak, Guttmacher Institute

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

In Florida, policymakers are considering a bill that would ban abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy. This bill and the inflammatory rhetoric surrounding it are straight from the well-worn antiabortion playbook of vilifying abortion later in pregnancy, regardless of the real-world harms to pregnant people.

New data from the Guttmacher Institute reveal one aspect of just how severe the consequences of this ban would be for the 3.9 million Florida women of reproductive age (15–44) and their families. The average one-way driving distance for a Florida woman of reproductive age to a clinic that could provide abortion care at or after 20 weeks would increase from 14 miles to 469 miles—more than 30 times as far. Put another way, that would be a nearly eight-hour road trip each way on average, if driving nonstop at 60 miles per hour.

Moreover, under such a ban, 92% of Florida women of reproductive age would have to travel at least 300 miles—again, each way—to reach the nearest clinic providing abortion care at 20 weeks or later in pregnancy. And 80% of Florida women would have to travel at least 400 miles each way to reach the nearest clinic providing this care.

If abortion at or after 20 weeks were no longer available in the state, the nearest clinic for most Florida women would be in Georgia (95% of women) or Alabama (5%). In both of those states, abortion is severely restricted and 22-week abortion bans are in effect, meaning that people would have very little time to raise needed funds, navigate travel logistics and overcome additional abortion restrictions like mandatory counseling requirements. This also means that if a Floridian needs an abortion after 22 weeks of pregnancy, the next nearest provider would be all the way in Ohio, Illinois or Washington, DC.

The Harm of Restrictions

The vast majority of abortions in the United States—98.7% of all abortions—occur at or before 20 weeks’ gestation, and 88% are provided at or before 12 weeks’ gestation. Yet, the relatively small number of abortions that happen later in pregnancy must be supported by the full range of medical options so the provider and patient can make situation-specific decisions.

As is the case with all abortion restrictions, the harm of dramatically increased travel distances and related logistics would fall hardest on those already facing oppression in various ways—whether because of their lack of financial resources, young age, disability, immigration status or because they are Black, Indigenous or other people of color. We also know from research that people who are denied abortions have worse health outcomes, along with other negative impacts.

In Florida alone, there have been 24 abortion restrictions enacted since Roe v. Wade, and each was designed to deter, slow down or otherwise derail people’s ability to get the abortion they want. Any restriction on its own is an unnecessary hardship, and the cumulative impact of decades of restrictions can effectively push abortion out of reach for many people.

Some people need and obtain abortions later in pregnancy—for many different reasons, including fetal diagnosis, unanticipated life events or because they face other abortion restrictions that cause a delay. Regardless of the reason why someone is seeking an abortion, every pregnant person deserves safe and compassionate care. 

First published online: March 1, 2021

Share

Printer-friendly version

Read More

Policy Analysis

State Policy Trends at Midyear 2021: Already the Worst Legislative Year Ever for U.S. Abortion Rights

Fact Sheet

Abortion in the United States

Fact Sheet

State Facts About Abortion: Florida

State Laws and Policies

State Bans on Abortion Throughout Pregnancy

Policy Analysis

Gestational Age Bans: Harmful at Any Stage of Pregnancy

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

COVID-19 Abortion Bans Would Greatly Increase Driving Distances for Those Seeking Care

Research Article

Distance traveled to obtain clinical abortion care in the United States and reasons for clinic choice

Journal of Women's Health
Research Article

Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis

The Lancet Public Health
Opinion

How one Colorado anti-abortion ballot initiative could affect pregnant people in over 30 states

The Colorado Sun

Topic

United States

  • Abortion

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.