Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Fact Sheet
March 2016

Induced Abortion and Postabortion Care in Tanzania

Also available in Swahili

 

• Tanzania has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in the world (410 per 100,000 live births), and unsafe abortion is one of its leading causes.

• Unsafe abortions account for more than one-third of hospitalizations for complications related to pregnancy1 and roughly one-quarter of maternal deaths.2,3

• Laws and policies on abortion in Tanzania are ambiguous and often confusing. The Penal Code is broadly understood to authorize abortion to save a woman’s life, but is unclear about whether the procedure is legal to preserve the woman’s physical or mental health.4 The fear of prosecution, prevalent among women and health care providers alike, drives women to seek clandestine abortions that are often unsafe.

ABORTION INCIDENCE

• In Tanzania, an estimated 405,000 abortions were performed in 2013. This number translates to a rate of 36 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–49 and a ratio of 21 abortions per 100 live births.

• The abortion rate is the same as the estimated rate for the East Africa region as a whole (36 per 1,000 women) and slightly higher than the rate for Sub-Saharan Africa (31).5

• Within Tanzania, abortion rates vary widely by zone, from 11 per 1,000 women in Zanzibar to 47 in the Southern Highlands and 51 in the Lake zone. The Lake zone and Southern Highlands also have high rates of treatment for complications of induced abortion.

• In 2013, in the country as a whole, 15% of pregnancies ended in abortions, 52% in intended births, 18% in unintended births and 15% in miscarriages. These distributions vary across zones—for example, the proportion of pregnancies ending in abortion ranges from 6% in Zanzibar to 18% in the Southern Highlands.

 

FACTORS UNDERLYING ABORTION RATES

• Several factors explain the variation in abortion rates by zone: differences in the number of children that women wish to have, in levels of sexual activity and contraceptive use, and in women’s likelihood of resorting to abortion in the event of an unintended pregnancy.

• About one in five women aged 15–49 in Tanzania wants to delay or stop having children but is not using any contraceptive method. This group of women is considered to have an unmet need for family planning.

• In the Lake zone, low contraceptive use (the lowest in the country) and high unmet need contribute to the zone’s high abortion rate and unintended pregnancy rate, which is the highest in the country.

• In the Southern Highlands, where contraceptive use is high, women with unintended pregnancies are more likely to resort to abortion than those in other zones, resulting in higher abortion rates: 59% of unintended pregnancies ended in abortion in the Southern Highlands in 2013, compared with less than 45% in other zones.

 

 

• Zanzibar’s relatively low abortion rate, at 11 per 1,000 women aged 15–49, is mainly due to its having the lowest unintended pregnancy rate in the country. Compared with their Mainland counterparts, women in Zanzibar tend to initiate sexual activity at a later age, and married women report lower levels of sexual activity.

AVAILABILITY OF POSTABORTION CARE

• In Tanzania in 2013, nearly 67,000 women were treated in health facilities for complications resulting from unsafe abortions. However, almost 100,000 other women who experienced complications requiring treatment in a health facility did not receive the medical attention they needed.

• Referral and regional hospitals treat the majority of Tanzania’s postabortion care cases; on average, they each treated about 1,140 and 710 cases in 2013, respectively.

• On average, just under eight facilities provide postabortion care for every 100,000 women in Tanzania. Zanzibar is the best served, with more than 10 facilities per 100,000 women, while the Eastern zone has the fewest services—fewer than six per 100,000.

• Treatment rates for abortion complications differ widely by region, partly because of the unequal distribution of post–abortion care providers.

STRENGTHENING POSTABORTION CARE AND CONTRACEPTIVE SERVICES

• Reducing unsafe abortions and the maternal deaths and injuries associated with them will require expanding access to contraceptive services (to prevent unintended pregnancies) and to postabortion care.

• Facilities at all levels should be fully stocked with the necessary drugs, supplies and equipment to provide basic postabortion care, and midlevel providers should be trained to provide such care.

• Postabortion care should work in tandem with contraceptive services because postabortion patients are highly receptive to contraceptive counseling.6,7 Studies have found that the vast majority of these patients adopt a contraceptive method and continue using it.8

• Postabortion care also provides an opportunity to involve men in family planning: Men accompanying their partners for postabortion care have been found to be receptive to contraceptive information.9

• Placing priority on the zones with the highest abortion rates, such as the Lake zone and the Southern Highlands, would be a cost-effective way to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity in Tanzania.

• Ambiguity about the abortion law in Tanzania should be clarified to support safe and legal procedures to the full extent allowed, and to ensure that women do not needlessly resort to unsafe procedures to terminate their pregnancies.

Source

Estimates were prepared by researchers from the Guttmacher Institute, New York; National Institute for Medical Research, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania; and Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania, and published in Keogh SC et al., Incidence of induced abortion and post-abortion care in Tanzania, PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(9):e0133933, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133933.

1. Price N, Ezekiel M and Hawkins K, Addressing the Reproductive Health Needs and Rights of Young People Since ICPD: The Contribution of UNFPA and IPPF, Tanzania Country Evaluation Report, 2003, Heidelberg, Germany: Euro Health Group, University of Heidelberg, No. 24.

2. Mswia R et al., Community-based monitoring of safe motherhood in the United Republic of Tanzania, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2003, 81(2):87–94.

3. Sorensen BL et al., Substandard emergency obstetric care—a confidential enquiry into maternal deaths at a regional hospital in Tanzania, Tropical Medicine & International Health, 2010, 15(8):894–900.

4. Center for Reproductive Rights, A Technical Guide to Understanding the Legal and Policy Framework on Termination of Pregnancy in Mainland Tanzania, New York: Center for Reproductive Rights, 2012.

5. World Health Organization, Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.

6. Wanjiru M et al., Assessing the Feasibility, Acceptability and Cost of Introducing Postabortion Care in Health Centres and Dispensaries in Rural Tanzania, Washington, DC: Population Council, 2007.

7. Nielsen KK et al., Expanding comprehensive postabortion care to primary health facilities in Geita District, Tanzania, African Journal of Reproductive Health, 2009, 13(2):129–138.

8. Rasch V, Yambesi F and Massawe S, Medium and long-term adherence to postabortion contraception among women having experienced unsafe abortion in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2008, 8:32.

9. Rasch V and Lyaruu MA, Unsafe abortion in Tanzania and the need for involving men in postabortion contraceptive counseling, Studies in Family Planning, 2005, 36(4):301–310.

References

1. Price N, Ezekiel M and Hawkins K, Addressing the Reproductive Health Needs and Rights of Young People Since ICPD: The Contribution of UNFPA and IPPF, Tanzania Country Evaluation Report, 2003, Heidelberg, Germany: Euro Health Group, University of Heidelberg, No. 24.

2. Mswia R et al., Community-based monitoring of safe motherhood in the United Republic of Tanzania, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2003, 81(2):87–94.

3. Sorensen BL et al., Substandard emergency obstetric care—a confidential enquiry into maternal deaths at a regional hospital in Tanzania, Tropical Medicine & International Health, 2010, 15(8):894–900.

4. Center for Reproductive Rights, A Technical Guide to Understanding the Legal and Policy Framework on Termination of Pregnancy in Mainland Tanzania, New York: Center for Reproductive Rights, 2012.

5. World Health Organization, Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.

6. Wanjiru M et al., Assessing the Feasibility, Acceptability and Cost of Introducing Postabortion Care in Health Centres and Dispensaries in Rural Tanzania, Washington, DC: Population Council, 2007.

7. Nielsen KK et al., Expanding comprehensive postabortion care to primary health facilities in Geita District, Tanzania, African Journal of Reproductive Health, 2009, 13(2):129–138.

8. Rasch V, Yambesi F and Massawe S, Medium and long-term adherence to postabortion contraception among women having experienced unsafe abortion in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2008, 8:32.

9. Rasch V and Lyaruu MA, Unsafe abortion in Tanzania and the need for involving men in postabortion contraceptive counseling, Studies in Family Planning, 2005, 36(4):301–310.

Acknowledgments

This fact sheet was made possible by grants from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the UK Government and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. The findings and conclusions contained within do not necessarily reflect the positions and policies of the donors.

Share

Download Fact Sheet

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Read More

Fact Sheet

Costs of Postabortion Care in the United Republic of Tanzania

Topic

Global

  • Abortion

Geography

  • Africa: United Republic of Tanzania
Partner
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.