Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Digest

Mother-Child Transmission of HIV in South Carolina Halved by Drug Therapy

The rate at which South Carolina women infected with HIV transmitted the disease to their newborns declined dramatically in the three years after the Public Health Service recommended a regimen of zidovudine therapy to reduce perinatal transmission of the virus.1 In 1993, the year before results of a large-scale clinical trial led the federal government to recommend zidovudine use for infected women during pregnancy and delivery, and for their infants during the perinatal period, 13% of babies born to women with HIV acquired the virus; for the years 1995-1997, the proportion was 6%. Furthermore, the transmission rate was significantly lower if zidovudine had been used at all three recommended times than if it had not.

To study the relationship between zidovudine use and perinatal transmission of HIV, analysts examined data from a statewide registry that includes all reported cases of HIV and AIDS; they supplemented this information by reviewing the medical records of infected women and their infants. The comparison of transmission rates before and after the government recommendations were issued included all mother-child pairs in whom the women were known to be HIV-positive before giving birth, received prenatal and delivery care in South Carolina and had a live birth: a total of 88 pairs in 1993 and 217 in 1995-1997. Subsequent analyses of the 1995-1997 cohort excluded women whose records lacked data on CD4 counts and illicit drug use during pregnancy (factors that could affect transmission), leaving a sample of 149 women.

In 1993, the rate of perinatal HIV transmission was 13%; for the three-year period 1995-1997, the rate was 6% (3-8% annually), and the difference was statistically significant. During the later period, the rate was significantly lower if the complete zidovudine regimen had been followed for the mother and child (3%) than if it had not (15%).

Between 1995 and 1997, the proportion of mother-child pairs who received all three parts of the recommended regimen increased steadily and significantly from 68% to 93%. Using individual logistic regression models, which did not control for potentially confounding variables, the analysts examined the effects of a wide range of factors on the likelihood of receipt of the complete regimen. According to the results, the likelihood that mother-child pairs had received all three parts of the treatment were significantly reduced if the mother had used illicit drugs or had had a sexually transmitted disease diagnosed during pregnancy (odds ratios, 0.4 and 0.1, respectively).

Other findings, while not achieving statistical significance, suggest additional relationships: The likelihood that women and their infants received the complete recommended treatment appears to be elevated among women with the lowest CD4 counts, residents of rural areas, women who experienced premature rupture of membranes more than four hours before delivery, those who had had adequate prenatal care, those lacking private insurance and those who delivered by cesarean.

In addition, the analysts found that the infant's infection status was significantly associated only with receipt of the complete zidovudine regimen: The odds of infection were reduced by 80% (odds ratio, 0.2) in mother-child pairs who had received zidovudine at all three recommended times. While the remaining findings were not statistically significant, they suggest that the risk of transmission is elevated among women with low CD4 counts, those who engaged in risky behaviors or had a sexually transmitted disease diagnosed during pregnancy, those who had had inadequate prenatal care and those who had received a prescription for zidovudine before becoming pregnant.

Summing up their findings, the researchers point out that their population-based study not only documents a decline in perinatal HIV transmission but also "demonstrates how quickly a small, southern, rural state responded to the recommendations for the use of zidovudine in HIV-1-infected pregnant women and their children." If transmission rates are to be reduced further, they conclude, interventions will be needed to address such problems as inadequate prenatal care and pregnant women's use of illicit drugs.--D. Hollander

REFERENCE

1. Harris NS et al., Zidovudine and perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission: a population-based approach, Pediatrics, 2002, 109(4), <http:// www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/109/4/e60&gt;.

Volume 34, Issue 5
September/October 2002
|
Pages 266 - 267

First published online: September 1, 2002

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.