Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Digest

Douching Raises Infection Risk, but Only for Women Without Bacterial Vaginosis

Authors

D. Hollander

Women with symptoms of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) who have douched recently are nearly twice as likely as those who have not practiced douching to have an upper genital tract disease, according to findings from a large, multisite clinical study.1 Douching is more common among women with bacterial vaginosis than among those without this condition, which has been suspected of facilitating the link between douching and upper genital tract inflammation (endometritis) or infection (chlamydia or gonorrhea). However, the association between douching and upper genital tract disease is statistically significant only among women who do not have bacterial vaginosis.

The study included women aged 14-37 attending 13 clinical sites (emergency departments, clinics and sexually transmitted disease units) in the eastern, southern and central United States in 1996-1999. Women were eligible to participate if they had signs of PID (discomfort for 30 days or more, organ tenderness during a pelvic examination, an excess number of white blood cells in vaginal secretions or cervical discharge). In addition to being screened for endometritis, upper genital tract infection and bacterial vaginosis, participants completed an interview that covered their background characteristics, douching habits and other factors related to the risk of upper genital tract disease. A total of 654 women were included in the analyses.

Women with endometritis or upper genital tract infection (roughly half of the cohort) were significantly more likely than those with neither type of disease to be younger than 20 (30% vs. 20%) and black (79% vs. 63%), and to smoke (49% vs. 40%) or use cocaine (5% vs. 2%). They were less likely than others to have any postsecondary education (18% vs. 30%) and to report a history of PID (26% vs. 35%).

Roughly two-fifths of participants had douched in the month before they enrolled in the study. In initial analyses, women who had douched more than once a month were significantly more likely than those who had not douched at all to have upper genital tract disease (odds ratio, 1.6). Women who had douched within the previous six days also had increased odds of disease, when compared with those who had not douched (1.8). The reason that women douched, the product used and the frequency of douching among women who had douched recently were not associated with the risk of endometritis or upper genital tract infection.

When the researchers used logistic regression to adjust for background and other risk factors (including a history of PID, having a new partner, smoking and using cocaine), women who had douched within the past six days retained an elevated risk of upper genital tract disease (odds ratio, 1.7). The odds were also raised for those who had douched more than once in the previous month (1.5), but the increase was only marginally significant. Because nationally representative survey data indicate that black women are more likely than white women to douche, the researchers performed separate analyses to measure the association between douching and upper genital tract inflammation or infection for black women only. Resulting odds ratios were similar to those for the overall cohort, but they did not achieve statistical significance.

Some 345 women had bacterial vaginosis, and 51% of them douched, a significantly higher proportion than found among women without this condition (28-36%). Contrary to the investigators' expectations, douching was not significantly associated with upper genital tract disease among those with bacterial vaginosis. However, among the remainder of the cohort, women who had douched within the past month and those who had douched within the past six days were twice as likely as those who had not douched to have an inflammation or infection (odds ratios, 1.8 and 2.3, respectively). Similarly, while douching was not associated with the risk of upper genital tract disease in women with gonorrhea or chlamydia, women with neither of these conditions had an increased risk if they had douched at all in the previous month (1.5), if they had douched more than once (2.4) and if they had douched recently (2.1).

Speculating as to why douching raises the risk of upper genital tract infection only in women without preexisting disease, the researchers suggest that "inciting upward bacterial movement" may initiate inflammation or infection but not exacerbate conditions that developed independent of douching. They conclude that their findings "add to the growing literature suggesting that douching might relate to PID."--D. Hollander

REFERENCE

1. Ness RB et al., Douching and endometritis: results from the PID Evaluation and Clinical Health (PEACH) Study, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2001, 28(4):240-245.

Volume 33, Issue 5
September/October 2001
|
Page 240

First published online: September 1, 2001

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.