Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Digest

Being Underweight Does Not Raise the Risk of Most Pregnancy Complications

Authors

D. Hollander

Underweight women are more likely than those of normal weight to have a preterm delivery or a low-birth-weight infant, but their risk of most complications of pregnancy and other poor outcomes is no greater than that of normal-weight women, according to findings from a population-based British study.1 Moreover, the prevalence of a number of adverse events--notably, preeclampsia, surgical obstetric interventions and postpartum hemorrhage, all of which contribute to the risk of maternal mortality--is lower among underweight women than among normal-weight women.

Using a database containing information from virtually all maternity units in the North West Thames section of London, the researchers analyzed the records of women who had a singleton pregnancy between 1988 and 1997. They calculated women's body mass index (weight divided by the square of height) at the start of prenatal care, and compared the experiences of roughly 38,000 women who were underweight (i.e., with a body mass index of less than 20) with those of 177,000 normal-weight women (i.e., who had an index of more than 20 but less than 25).

Most of the women were white (64% of those who were underweight and 73% of their normal-weight counterparts); about half of each group had not given birth before, and one-third had had one previous birth. When the women first visited their maternity care facility, 3-4% had hypertension; negligible proportions had diabetes.

The researchers examined four types of variables: prenatal, maternal and delivery complications, and pregnancy outcomes. They assessed the independent effect of body mass index through a series of multiple logistic regression analyses that controlled for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, history of hypertension and diabetes, and additional factors of specific importance for individual variables.

Body mass index was significantly associated with four prenatal complications. Underweight women were more likely than normal-weight women to be anemic (odds ratio, 1.3). However, they were less likely to develop preeclampsia (0.8) or gestational diabetes (0.6), or to begin care late in pregnancy (0.4). The odds of placenta previa, placental abruption and breech presentation were similar in both groups of women.

Maternal complications (e.g., genital or urinary tract infection, pulmonary embolism and wound infection) were rare, affecting no more than 1% of women in either group. Roughly 20% of both underweight and normal-weight women required a prolonged postpartum hospital stay. The likelihood of these events did not differ significantly according to women's body mass index.

All seven delivery-related complications that the investigators examined were associated with body mass index. Underweight women had significantly elevated odds of having a breech delivery (1.3) but reduced odds of requiring induced labor, an operative vaginal delivery, or an emergency or elective cesarean delivery (0.7-0.9). They also were less likely than normal-weight women to have a postpartum hemorrhage or major postpartum hemorrhage (0.8-0.9).

Two adverse pregnancy outcomes were more common among underweight women than among their normal-weight counterparts: Women with a low body mass index had an increased risk of bearing an infant whose weight was below the fifth percentile (1.4). They also had elevated odds of delivering before 37 weeks' gestation (1.2), but not before 32 weeks, which the researchers note is a more "clinically important" threshold. Other outcomes that were significantly related to low body mass index were breastfeeding (0.9), having an infant with a birth weight above the 90th percentile (0.5) and admission to a special care baby unit more than 24 hours after giving birth (1.1). Delivery after 42 weeks, stillbirth and infants' Apgar scores were not affected by body mass index.

According to the investigators, the "main adverse outcomes" associated with a woman's being underweight early in pregnancy are an increased risk of having a low-birth-weight infant or a premature delivery, but the "clinical and pathological significance" of these associations is unclear. The researchers conclude that being underweight does not increase the risk of most problems that may occur during or just after pregnancy, and it may protect against some "major" factors related to maternal mortality.--D. Hollander

REFERENCE

1. Sebire NJ et al., Is maternal underweight really a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome? a population-based study in London, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001, 108(1):61-66.

Volume 33, Issue 4
July/August 2001
|
Page 187

First published online: July 1, 2001

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.