Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Donate
 

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

A journal of peer-reviewed research

Beyond Political Claims: Women's Interest In and Emotional Response to Viewing Their Ultrasound Image in Abortion Care

kimport_et_al-2014.pdf

Authors

Katrina Kimport Tracy A. Weitz Diana Greene Foster, ANSIRH
CONTEXT

In the United States, abortion opponents have supported legislation requiring that abortion patients be offered the opportunity to view their preprocedure ultrasound. Little research has examined women's interest in and emotional response to such viewing.

METHODS

Data from 702 women who received abortions at 30 facilities throughout the United States between 2008 and 2010 were analyzed. Mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to determine which characteristics were associated with being offered and choosing to view ultrasounds, and with reporting positive or negative emotional responses to viewing. Grounded theory analytic techniques were used to qualitatively describe women's reports of their emotional responses.

RESULTS

Forty-eight percent of participants were offered the opportunity to view their ultrasound, and nulliparous women were more likely than others to receive an offer (odds ratio, 2.3). Sixty-five percent of these women (31% overall) chose to view the image; nulliparous women and those living in a state that regulates viewing were more likely than their counterparts to do so (1.7 and 2.5, respectively). Some 213 women reported emotional responses to viewing; neutral emotions (fine, nothing) were the most commonly reported ones, followed by negative emotions (sad, guilty, upset) and then positive emotions (happy, excited). Women who visited clinics with a policy of offering viewing had increased odds of reporting a negative emotion (2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound viewing appears not to have a singular emotional effect. The presence of state regulation and facility policies matters for women's interest in and responses to viewing.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2014, 46(4):TK, doi: 10.1363/46e2414

Author's Affiliations

Katrina Kimport is assistant professor, and Tracy A. Weitz and Diana Greene Foster are associate professors, all at Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.
Volume 46, Issue 4
December 2014
|
Pages 185 - 191

First published online: September 10, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/46e2414
Source / Available for Purchase
Full featured article available to subscribers

Share

PSRH menu

  • About PSRH
  • Find PSRH articles
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.