Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Donate
 

International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

A journal of peer-reviewed research

Effects of Interventions Addressing School Environments or Educational Assets on Adolescent Sexual Health: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

4411118.pdf

Authors

Amy J. Peterson, ETR Melissa Donze, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Elizabeth Allen Chris Bonell
CONTEXT

School-based interventions that aim to modify sexual health knowledge, attitudes and behaviors have mixed and often unsustained effects on adolescent sexual health outcomes. However, observational evidence suggests that broader school-related factors, such as school climate and academic attainment, can influence outcomes.

METHODS

Nine databases were searched in July 2017 for randomized and quasi-experimental evaluations of interventions addressing school-level environment or student-level educational assets, to examine whether such interventions can promote young people’s sexual health. Searches were limited to studies published since 1990 but were not restricted by language. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and synthesized narratively and meta-analytically.

RESULTS

Searches yielded 11 evaluations, published from 1999 to 2016, of interventions related to school-level environment or student-level educational assets. Because of inconsistent reporting, the risk of bias was not clear for most studies, and meta-analysis was possible for only one outcome. The meta-analysis of three randomized trials provided some evidence that school-environment interventions may delay sexual debut (pooled odds ratio, 0.5). Narrative synthesis of the remaining outcomes found mixed results, but suggests that interventions addressing school-level environment may delay sexual debut and that those addressing student-level educational assets may reduce risk of pregnancy and STDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional and more rigorous evidence is needed to assess the probability that interventions addressing school-related factors are effective and to provide better understanding of the mechanisms by which they may work to improve adolescent sexual health.

Author's Affiliations

Amy J. Peterson is program manager, ETR, Scotts Valley, CA, USA, and a doctoral degree candidate, Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London. Melissa Donze is city research scientist, Division of Epidemiology, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York. Elizabeth Allen is professor, Department of Medical Statistics; and Chris Bonell is professor, Department of Public Health Sociology, and head, Department of Public Health, Environments and Society—both at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.
Volume 44, Issue 3
September 2018
|
Pages 111 - 131

First published online: June 25, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/44e6818
Source / Available for Purchase
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1363/44e6818

Share

IPSRH

  • About IPSRH
  • Find IPSRH Articles
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.