1. Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. 379 (1979).
2. Cohen SA and Saul R, The campaign against ‘partial-birth’ abortion: status and fallout, Guttmacher Report on Public Policy, 1998, 1(6):6–10, https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/1998/12/campaign-against-partial-birth-abortion-status-and-fallout.
3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992); Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 136 S. Ct. 2292 (2016).
4. Rysavy MA et al., Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants, New England Journal of Medicine, 2015, 372(19):1801–1811, http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1410689.
5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Facts are important: fetal pain, 2013, https://www.acog.org/-/media/Departments/Government-Relations-and-Outreach/FactAreImportFetalPain.pdf.
6. Lee SJ et al., Fetal pain: a systematic multidisciplinary review of the evidence, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2005, 294(8):947–954.
7. ACOG Wisconsin Section, 20-week abortion ban legislation, no date, https://images.magnetmail.net/images/clients/ACOG/attach/WI_IssuePaper20WeekAbortionBan_updated.pdf.
8. Foster DG and Kimport K, Who seeks abortions at or after 20 weeks?, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1363/4521013/pdf.
9. Jerman J and Jones RK, Secondary measures of access to abortion services in the United States, 2011 and 2012: gestational age limits, cost, and harassment, Women's Health Issues, 2014, 24(4):e419–e424, http://www.whijournal.com/article/S1049-3867(14)00058-9/fulltext.
10. Finer LB et al., Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States, Contraception, 2006, 74(4):334–344.
11. Jones RK and Jerman J, Characteristics and circumstances of U.S. women who obtain very early and second-trimester abortions, PLOS ONE, 2017, 12(1):e0169969.
12. Guttmacher Institute, Induced abortion in the United States, Fact Sheet, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2017, https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states.
13. Donovan MK, D&E abortion bans: the implications of banning the most common second-trimester procedure, Guttmacher Policy Review, 2017, 20:35–38, https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2017/02/de-abortion-bans-implications-banning-most-common-second-trimester-procedure.
14. Rocca CH et al., Women’s emotions one week after receiving or being denied an abortion in the United States, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2013, 45(3):122−131, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1363/4512213/pdf.
15. ACOG, Abortion Policy, 2017, https://www.acog.org/Clinical-Guidance-and-Publications/Statements-of-Policy-List.
16. Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007).
17. American Civil Liberties Union, Stenberg v. Carhart: a legal analysis, https://www.aclu.org/other/stenberg-v-carhart-legal-analysis.
18. Guttmacher Institute, Bans on specific abortion methods used after the first trimester, State Laws and Policies (as of October 1, 2019), 2019, https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/bans-specific-abortion-methods-used-after-first-trimester.
19. Petition of Plaintiffs, Hodes & Nauser v. Schmidt, Kan. Dist. Ct., June 1, 2015, http://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/SB-95%20Petition-Signed-not-File-Stamped.pdf.