CONTEXT

Many incarcerated women have an unmet need for contraception. Providing access to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods—IUDs and implants—before release is one strategy to meet this need and potentially prepare them for reentry to the community, but the safety and feasibility of providing these methods in this setting have not been described.

METHODS

A retrospective descriptive study of all LARC insertions at the San Francisco County Jail in 2009–2014 was conducted. Data from community clinic and jail clinic databases were assessed to examine baseline characteristics of LARC initiators, complications from insertion, method continuation, and pregnancy and reincarceration rates. Correlates of method discontinuation were assessed in multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven LARC devices were inserted during the study period—53 IUDs and 34 implants. There were no cases of pelvic inflammatory disease or other insertion complications in IUD users and no serious complications in implant users. Median duration of known use was 11.4 months for IUDs and 12.9 months for implants. Women who discontinued a LARC method most commonly cited a desire to get pregnant (32%). Black women were more likely than whites to discontinue use (odds ratio, 4.4).

CONCLUSIONS

It is safe and feasible to provide LARC methods to incarcerated women. Correctional facilities should consider increasing access to all available contraceptives, including LARC methods, in a noncoercive manner as a strategy to reduce reproductive health disparities among marginalized women at high risk of unplanned pregnancies.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2015, 47(4):TK, doi: 10.1363/47e5915